server_diffs
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
|
server_diffs [2008/02/03 11:22] 4.245.78.63 |
server_diffs [2008/02/25 16:47] (current) 4.245.75.44 |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
| * Some commands in your .exrc might not work with vim. | * Some commands in your .exrc might not work with vim. | ||
| * Advanced features ov "vim" will not be available with "vi". | * Advanced features ov "vim" will not be available with "vi". | ||
| + | * The default editor on Linux systems, such as budlight, appears to be "nano" instead of "vi", so other commands that invoke the editor will probably invoke the wrong one if you normally use vi. The solution modify your shell's profile script, such as ".profile" to set the EDITOR variable to vi, for example, "EDITOR=vi". | ||
| * [[http://www.openssh.com/|ssh]]: | * [[http://www.openssh.com/|ssh]]: | ||
| * The SSH and SCP on michelob are very old, so some newer features are not available. | * The SSH and SCP on michelob are very old, so some newer features are not available. | ||
| Line 53: | Line 54: | ||
| * sendmail is not installed on budlight, it has postfix instead. | * sendmail is not installed on budlight, it has postfix instead. | ||
| * procmail is not installed on budlight. | * procmail is not installed on budlight. | ||
| - | * There are spamd daemons on michelob and dark, but not budlight. This is for use of the spamc command instead of the spamassassin command for faster perform ance when scanning for spam. | + | * There are spamd daemons on michelob and dark, but not budlight. This is for use of the spamc command instead of the spamassassin command for faster performance when scanning for spam. |
server_diffs.1202059354.txt.gz ยท Last modified: 2008/02/03 11:22 by 4.245.78.63
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
