User Tools

Site Tools


steercom:2020-02

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
steercom:2020-02 [2020/02/04 00:25]
127.0.0.1 external edit
steercom:2020-02 [2020/03/02 08:16] (current)
Line 65: Line 65:
 ^ USPS - PO Box | | -$154.00 | ^ USPS - PO Box | | -$154.00 |
 ^ Balance as of 31 December | | |$3,562.66 | ^ Balance as of 31 December | | |$3,562.66 |
-  * January 2020 ~ Post Office Box Renewal due (for 300 year?) ~ Autodraft.+  * January 2020 ~ Post Office Box Renewal due (for 300 year?​) ​:?: ~ Autodraft.
   * 2020-02-03 ​   * 2020-02-03 ​
  
Line 829: Line 829:
     * Lee Lammert and Mike Knight working on SpamAssassin. Extensive plan developed by Mike Knight.     * Lee Lammert and Mike Knight working on SpamAssassin. Extensive plan developed by Mike Knight.
     * QUESTION (Stan): Do we have to worry about losing ownership of the stllug.org domains?     * QUESTION (Stan): Do we have to worry about losing ownership of the stllug.org domains?
-    * ANSWER ​+    * ANSWER ​:?:
   * 2019-02-04   * 2019-02-04
-    * Lee: Everything'​s up and running thanks to Mike. New topic: DCC. What is it? Lee has no clue.+    * Lee: Everything'​s up and running thanks to Mike. New topic: DCC. What is it? :?: Lee has no clue.
   * 2019-03-04   * 2019-03-04
     * Lee: Server is running.     * Lee: Server is running.
Line 846: Line 846:
     * Dave & Stan would like long '​spammy'​ tag not inserted into subject line on SLUUG STEERCOM emails     * Dave & Stan would like long '​spammy'​ tag not inserted into subject line on SLUUG STEERCOM emails
     * From Mike Knight'​s email 3:31am 2019-04-28:     * From Mike Knight'​s email 3:31am 2019-04-28:
-      * 1 QUESTION: Should the "​Subject:"​ of probable ​sp_m be changed to indicate that?+      * 1 QUESTION: Should the "​Subject:"​ of probable ​spam be changed to indicate that?
         * ANSWER: no         * ANSWER: no
-      * 2 QUESTION: Should high scoring ​sp_m be rejected and returned to sender?+      * 2 QUESTION: Should high scoring ​spam be rejected and returned to sender?
         * ANSWER: no         * ANSWER: no
-      * 3 QUESTION: Should moderate scoring ​sp_m be moved to a "​junk"​ folder of the member'​s inbox by the system?+      * 3 QUESTION: Should moderate scoring ​spam be moved to a "​junk"​ folder of the member'​s inbox by the system?
         * ANSWER: no         * ANSWER: no
   * 2019-06-03   * 2019-06-03
Line 877: Line 877:
       * QUESTION: Was this related?       * QUESTION: Was this related?
         * Mike Knight created and tested some scripts dealing with our LetsEncrypt setup.         * Mike Knight created and tested some scripts dealing with our LetsEncrypt setup.
-        * :?: +        * :?: SPF is not a class in the libraries. ​ Digg doesn'​t know what it is.  TFT is a record type and SPF is the content. 
-      * QUESTION: Do we know what happend ​with SLUUG certificate not working with securing the email on Christmas Day? +      * QUESTION: Do we know what happened ​with SLUUG certificate not working with securing the email on Christmas Day? 
-        * :?:+        * :?:   cert was incorrect because cert renewal needed to be restarted. ​ The patches in Dovecot didn't get in because the script hadn't run.   ​Solution=Script is now set to run EVERY nite.
       * QUESTION: Do we have any documentation on the overall *automated* process for LetsEncrypt free SSL certificates for websites on BOCK?       * QUESTION: Do we have any documentation on the overall *automated* process for LetsEncrypt free SSL certificates for websites on BOCK?
         * :?:         * :?:
-    * Mike Knight is invesigating ​why SLUUG was being throttled by Google. ​ Possibly something to do with the SLUUG SPF record being regarded as "​suspicious"​ by Google. ​+    * Mike Knight is investigating ​why SLUUG was being throttled by Google. ​ Possibly something to do with the SLUUG SPF record being regarded as "​suspicious"​ by Google. ​
       * :?:       * :?:
  
Line 1329: Line 1329:
  
 ====== New Business ====== ====== New Business ======
 +
 +===== Red Hat contact =====
 +Adam R. Motlik in Kansas city is our **new potential contact.** ​   ​
 +RHCSA, Sec+, ITILv3, DCSE    ​
 +Mobile: 314.266.8048
 +
 +Gary met him at the Red Hat MeetUp held on Jan 15 at Granite City Brewery on Olive. (near WWT who seems to be a major customer.) ​  
 +(yyyyyyyyyy :?: was there. ​ He has been to a number of our mtngs and has just changed jobs from Scott AFB to Boeing. ​  ​Possibly we'll see more of him.   Also Jim zzzzzz :?: from Panera Bread. ​  He is manager of a team and has been to a few of our mtngs.)
 +
 +Adam said that nite that he may become more active with StL, (and particularly SLUUG).
 +
 +The current contact for the Red Hat MeetUp in StL is <Robert Proffitt ="​Monument,​ CO , Sr. Solution Architect”>​ who has been the contact for a few years now.
 +He seems familiar with a couple StL account customers, particularly WWT.  He's neevr really seemed interested in co-ordinating w SLUUG. ​ This time he seemed less enthusiastic about the actual mtup then previous trips into town. Perhaps he intends to change his role.   
 +
 +He generally seems to demur any knowledge or active role in organizing it, deferring to:
 +
 +Crystal Murphy="​Raleigh,​ NC .  I manage the Meetup and User Group programs for North America for Red Hat. ",
 + ​Nicole Maselli '"​Raleigh,​ NC.  Field Marketing Intern. Supports Crystal Murphy on all NA RHUGs and Meetups"​.
 +
 +I've talked to one of these ladies in the past.  They SAY they will remember to contact us directly as the local group, but they never do.  They seem to just be setting up a mtng schedule when told to do so and then tell Robert he needs to be there on that date with a speaker or 3.
 +
 +**Adam in KC followed up** with an e-mail to me on Jan 21 saying ...
 +
 +**"​Please include me on future correspondence regarding SLUGG"​.** ​  
 +
 +I don't know if there are internal maneuverings or if Adam is just more interested in being involved. ​ There was also a Red Hatter from Chicago and one from southern Missouri (Springfield?​) who both also seemed interested that we were having SuSE in town to speak on CEPF and wished they could stay and be at the CEPH talk!   All 3 of these guys seem to be more eager to be involved with user groups. ​  (I THINK I have the Chicago name & contact info also.  :?:)
 +
 +Lee (or anyone else)  -who else did we have as a contact with Red Hat?   :?:
 +
 +So...for now, nothing official, but Adam & Chicago & South MO would seem to be our most likely/​willing contacts.
 +
 +
  
 ===== Annual Meeting and Elections ===== ===== Annual Meeting and Elections =====
steercom/2020-02.1580797542.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/02/04 00:25 by 127.0.0.1